ANDREW RAZEGHI BLOGS

July 25, 2011

To Know Someone.

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 9:23 am

The other day, the co-founder of one of the companies I am an investor in, asked me how I knew a particular person. I found myself having difficulty answering the question for one simple reason: I know the person rather well (and he knows me), but we have never met face-to-face. It got me thinking: what does it really mean to know a person in a world where everyone is only a few LinkedIn connections or Twitter followers apart? It seems the acquiantance is fast becoming an artifact of the past? And what are the implications of these emerging relationships on innovation?

In my work with start-ups and with corporate innovators, I’ve come to learn alot over the years; however what I’ve really come to appreciate are the strength of the relationships I’ve made and I’ve seen others make with those around them. I’m not talking about Twitter followers and Klout scores, rather I’m talking about the quality of the relationship that exists between two people.

While it goes without saying that we are hyper-connected today, I believe we are further apart in understanding what it takes to nurture great relationships - relationships that bear fruit for both individuals involved. Relationship-building seems to have taken a back seat to “follower building”. Just because someone follows you on a social network, does not mean they listen to you, act on your advice, or - frankly - care. Most social networks are like big, socially-awkward, Homecoming dances replete with wrist corsages and sky blue tuxedoes screaming out “love me, want me, hold me, please be my friend.” And, believe me, my tux is just as ugly as yours.  

So, here’s what I think we can all do in order to get back to the root of relationships, the backbone of successful innovation. It starts with an understanding of what innovation is and what it’s not.

The difference between creativity and innovation is simple. Creativity is a cognitive science. It’s about how you think. Innovation, on the other hand, is a social science. It’s about how you interact with others. While there are many creative people in this world (in fact, I’d argue everyone is creative in some capacity); there are fewer innovators (those who can apply the collective creativity of a group towards a shared vision to solve a problem).

Here are common mistakes I see people make (and ways you can work to correct them):

1) Wanting (vs Giving). A VC friend of mine, Matt McCall at New World Ventures, summarizes this nicely. To paraphrase Matt: “If the first time you meet me you are asking me for money, you’ll likely not get it.” Give before you get. You can give of your time, your knowledge, your own network, your skills, talents, sweat equity. Successful people like to help people. “Give and ye shall receive.”

2) Don’t Rush It. Because of the fact that we are so connected “technically”, we mistakenly believe that just because I can find a person quickly translates into developing a relationship as quickly. Humans simply don’t work that way. Don’t rush it. If you consider every person you meet as a transaction, that’s all it will ever be. Invest the time on the front-end to get to know a person. Listen to them. Find out what they are trying to achieve. Even the most successful people on the planet have dreams and aspirations yet unfulfilled. Find out what those are. Be interested in them. Who knows? Maybe you’re the person that can help them most?  

3) You Don’t Need a Reason to Connect. Every time you meet with someone, you don’t necessarily have to have an agenda. Sure, it seems unnatural to just want to “get together”, but frankly, friends don’t have agendas. In fact, I would argue the absence of an agenda is what makes the best friends. Try getting together with a person you want to meet “just because” you’d like to meet them. And, when you do, don’t ask for anything: no favors, no introductions, no money. Just talk.

4) Working With Time Constraints. My previous dean at Kellogg (Dipak Jain), like most CEOs, was always pressed for time, yet very valuable mentor to our students. So, in a creative way of finding time, Deepak would offer to meet with students on his drive home from the airport. They’d agree to pick him up and he’d agree to listen! He got a ride. They got advice. Win-win.

5) Avoid Gimmicks. Be Honest. I don’t mean to sound overly-simplistic here, but the old adage “if you want money ask for advice; if you want advice ask for money”, well, I’ve seen it go sideways a lot recently. A cliche out of control. Look, if you want money, ask for money. If you want advice, ask for advice. Investors (good investors) want to invest in great ideas and amibitous founders. It sounds good as a cliche, but frankly, it only makes the agenda part of the relationship that much more obvious.

6) Create Your Brand. Your personal brand is what people talk about when you’re not in the room. What do you want to be known for? (and not a “results-driven professional who fosters innovation and excellence”). Rather, what do you want people saying about you in very speicifc terms? Wouldn’t you rather be talked about by those you admire and those you mentor as a person who “made it happen” for them? (vs. a person who suggested that they make it happen?).

7) Let Them Win. If you want to deepen your relationships with others, do as my good friend, Chris Eastwood, an exec. at Time, Inc., often says: “Let them win.” Quit looking for all the holes in their argument. Quit trying to sound or look smarter than them. Let them win. Better yet, help them win.

Now, if someone can figure out a way to reinvent social networking with these principles in mind, move over Facebook.

July 15, 2011

The greatest investor pitch in America’s history.

Filed under: Innovation, Inspirational — admin @ 10:06 am

Many know it, but few may know the reason it was written: to raise money. There is perhaps no greater testament to the power of words. Innovators, entrepreneurs, and dreamers, take note of your words (the story you are telling) the next time you need to convince someone to invest in you.  

The New Colossus

By Emma Lazarus, 1883

Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lightning, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon-hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

June 21, 2011

Think Differently Is Useless Advice. Try this instead…

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 11:45 am

Think differently. It’s advice as useful to would-be innovators as swing differently is to golfers. Sure, if you’re having a rough day on the golf course, you may want to change-up your swing, but if you don’t know what’s wrong with your swing, how on earth would you know how to change it?

The fact is: we know how innovators think and so why not attempt to think like them? As it turns out, they don’t think “differently”. They think deliberately - in specific ways. Here’s how: 

1) Think Big Early. Vision is not what you see. It’s what you believe. You need to stretch your imagination because after you overlay the realities of the market, operational, and financial constraints, the idea you eventually introduce to market will be a fraction of your original aspiration. For example, Walt Disney’s original vision for his Florida park (orignally called “Project X”) was not a “thematic” vision. It was a “solution to the problems of our cities”. He was talking about schools, housing, healthcare, transportation, etc. Unfortunately he died before his vision was realized and we ended up with, EPCOT. Think big, early.  

2) Don’t innovate. Solve problems. Innovators don’t try to “be innovative”. They focus -obsessively-focus - on problems that need to be solved. Trying to innovate is like trying to be funny. It doesn’t work and often ends-up in well-deserved heckling from passersby. Enter stage left: the billion-dollar smokeless cigarrette, Gerber singles baby food for adults, and the Pontiac Aztec. Don’t hang innovation on the wall. Hang problems on the walls. Solve for those.

3) Innovation is not only about new products. Innovation is about finding a better way to do how you do what you do such that customers choose you. That could involve alternate distribution channels (e.g., NowSpots.com), new ways of pricing and/or capturing value (e.g., the freemium model), improved customer experiences (Giveforward.com), brand innovation (e.g., Virgin), new business models (Tap.Me, Inc.), better processes for driving costs out of production (e.g., Dell), etc. Think more holistically about “innovation”. It’s as much about the how as the what.

4) Pivot. Pivot does not mean “give up on the original idea”. Nor does pivot mean “move both feet”. What pivot is intended to help people do is to remain steadfast to the spirit of your idea while changing applications and perspectives. For example, the Honda Element was intended to be purchased by 20-somethings, but found success with baby boomers (thus jokingly referred to by teenagers as the Honda “Elderment”); group-dating website Ignighter was launched in the United States, but found growth in India; and - perhaps most famously, Groupon was originally The Point (the furthest thing from a group coupon website one could imagine). If what you set out to do is no longer working, be prepared to try alternate channels of distribution, target a new customer segment, change-up the underlying incentives offered, etc. Don’t give up, change-up.

5) Don’t invent, assemble. As it turns out, many great innovators don’t invent anything. They “design” the model or the system out of existing ideas. For example, Henry Ford did not invent the assembly line. He “assembled” it (pun intended). He took 3 existing concepts and - to quote Ford - “invented nothing new”. Concept 1: he came to Chicago and observed our meatpacking industry and asked: what if I did that in reverse? Rather than disassemble things (cows and pigs), I’ll put them together. Concept 2: he borrowed an idea from the firearms industyr (inter-changeable parts). Concept 3: he borrowed yet a third idea from the tobacco industry (continuous flow production). Put them together and “invented nothing new”. Don’t [only] invent, assemble.

6) Observe. Some of the best wisdom I’ve ever received was from Paul Orfalea (aka “Kinko”). “Andrew,” he said, “the problem with vision is that people see with their ears” (what other people say) and thus you need to learn to “listen with your eyes”. Observation is more powerful than conversation when it comes to innovation.

…okay, that’s it for now - gotta’ catch a flight! But if you want to learn more, pick-up a copy of my book, THE RIDDLE: Where Ideas Come From and How to Have Better Ones (Wiley). Or feel free to email me. andrew@andrewrazeghi.com.

June 13, 2011

The [Warren] Buffett Test (and the metric I care about most).

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 5:40 pm

“We believe noble intentions should be checked periodically against results. We test the wisdom of retained earnings by assessing whether retention, over time, delivers at least $1 of market value for each $1 retained.” - from Warren Buffett’s letter to shareholders, 1984 Berkshire Hathaway Annual Report

In full disclosure, I am not a finance professor (nor do I play one on the Internet nor did I do particularly well in my undergraduate finance courses), but, if you ask me: if I were stranded on a desert island and allowed only one financial metric by which to measure the efficacy of a firm’s management, this is it:

Market Value Added = market value (equity and debt) - total capital

When all is said and done, it answers the question that really matters: How capable is management of “managing” given the risks inherent in the industry/category in which they compete and the capital investors bestow upon / entrust to them?

Fact is: as an investor, while I am interested in sales growth, earnings growth, TSR, etc., I am only intersted insofar that - at the end of the day - I get out more than I put in.

June 6, 2011

Top 10 Reasons Your Big Idea is Doomed (unless you do this).

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 10:51 am

“Why don’t these people get it?” “Customers won’t give us credit.” These are two phrases all too common in the world of new ideas. Well, here’s the thing: it’s not that people don’t understand your big idea, they don’t care, yet. Same goes for giving you credit. Creative problem-solving qualifies you for nothing more than acceptance into the animal kingdom. When new ideas are misunderstood and/or undervalued, these are typically symptoms to much bigger problems. Fix these underlying problems and your odds of success will improve.

 

 Top 10 Reasons Your Idea Is Doomed (if you don’t take action now!) 

10. Your idea is predicated on false assumptions. If X is true, Y will happen. This logic works for earthquakes and thunderstorms. It doesn’t work for innovation. Unlike operational improvements or quality control, both based on facts and correlations, innovation is a non-linear exercise based on assumptions. Get the assumptions wrong and your dead in the water. For example, I was in a conversation with a new venture team recently and the founders mentioned that once people download their app, their lives will be improved. The founder spent all of 3 seconds on the false assumption that somehow people will “download the app”. This is on par with saying, well, once Wal-Mart carries our product, consumers will love it. Two things you need to do: first, go to Bentonville, Arkanas, sit in the hot seat that is purchasing’s offices, and see what happens. You’ll get religion on product adoption real fast. After you’ve done that, shift 97% of your focus to how you are going to drive adoption. In my experience, far too many new venture teams live (and die) by the false assumption that they will get distribution based on the unique character of the idea itself. 

9. Your product is all things to all people (e.g., product with many meanings and/or benefits). If your customers cannot describe your benefit and/or the usage occasion of your idea in a single word, you’re in over your head. This is not to say you can’t offer adjacent products or services, but in your core product line, you need to mean something to someone or mean nothing to everyone. Own something in the mind of your customer. Something could be a usage occasion, a problem, a time of day, etc. 

8. Your product is the right idea…for the wrong market. Yes, you’re on to something big, but likely focused on selling it through the wrong channel and/or to the wrong end-consumer. For example, Ignightor began in the U.S., but grew exponentially in India. Groupon started by trying to save the world, but became a deal site, etc. Before you give up on the idea, try to re-position in a different channel or to an different end-user. 

7. Your idea is designed on a passing fad (thought to be a disruptive shift in the market). If you are chasing headlines, you will never write them. By all means, if your strategy (and the structure of your company) is to take advantage of fads, go for it. However, if your intention is to manage a sustainably profitable business, bet on market disruption. For example, the shifts from convenient to more convenient; fast to faster; and cheap to cheaper are irreversible shifts. To quote Jeff Bezos, rather than bet on what will change, bet on what will remain the same. 

6. Your venture assumes competitors will not and/or cannot respond (and quickly). Often true but not always. Just because an obvious giant is asleep doesn’t mean they can’t be awaken by a declining stock price, new CEO, or an activist stockholder. Always assume the 800-pound gorilla is chasing you and learn to run faster. 

5. Your idea is inherently not scalable. All too often, I see teams fail to track and measure the total costs associated with the production, marketing, and distribution of their ideas. For example, if you need to add headcount or manufacturing capacity or media every time you add a new feature and/or enter a new market, etc. you need to understand the relative nature of these costs on acquiring customers. 

4. Your idea has no unique and protectable competitive advantage (this does not mean simply having a patent; it could be brand, channel exclusivity, customer experience, pricing flexibility to maintain share, etc.). You may be unique at market entry, but how will you sustain your position over time. Great innovators create and manage portfolios of ideas introduced in a timely and coordinated fashion to “remain relevant” (defense) while “creating incremental value” (offense). By managing a portfolio vs. a product, you live into the adage: a good defense is a good offense. Always assume your current product will be marginalized by someone more creative or faster or better than you. 

3. Your idea assumes current solutions are so dreadful that customers would do anything to switch. Fact is: we’re lazy. Unless you make switching painfully easy (i.e., you do it for me), the idea alone will not convince otherwise. 

2. Your idea requires some extreme change in behavior without offering a corresponding exponential benefit in return. The Nobel Prize in Economics was awarded for proving this simply hypothesis that we value what we have/know more than what we don’t. If you don’t understand “behavioral economics”, you need to…now. Wiki it. 

1. Your idea is a solution in search of a problem. If you can’t articulate what the world would be like without your idea and why in the absence of your idea would someone either cause harm, inconvenience, hassle, frustration, or departure from joy…you need to go back to the drawing board. Great innovators solve problems. 

Keep this list close. The next time your team proposes a new idea (or you propose one to others), make sure you are not walking the plank of doom. Better yet, use this list to control ideation. The more informed your team is during the ideation process, the better your likely outcomes.

May 31, 2011

How to Win New Customers: Don’t Be Greedy

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 2:49 pm

In the first year of our marriage, my wife and I had our first fight at, of all places, the grocery store. We fought over, of all things, sauce for making Asian stir fry.

She grabbed the thick, syrupy kind as I reached for the traditional soy sauce – the good stuff. That’s when the disagreement began.

There we were: she with her bottle and I with mine. “No, no, no,” I said as I pointed to her bottle, “not that stuff.” Holding up a bottle of Kikkoman’s finest, I continued defiantly, “This is what we need!” “That’s all you’re going to put on it,” she asked. “All?” I responded. “If by all you mean this is all you all you need to create a party in your tummy, than yes, this is all!”

The conversation quickly escalated. She began wondering who the hell she married and I the same and five minutes later we checked-out of the store with, you guessed it, both bottles and our egos squarely intact. Funny enough, even though we have been married for more than ten years, we still buy two bottles of Asian stir fry sauce - although we no longer argue over them. Why do people disagree over things as innocuous as condiments? It has to do with the way we were raised and, more importantly, what we were raised with.

We crave things that are familiar to us. And nothing is more familiar than family.

In an Australian study, McNair Ingenuity Research asked more than 600 people whether they used the same brands as their parents. The study focused specifically on eight product categories: soap, toothpaste, washing powder, coffee, cars, banks, insurance, and newspapers. The product most likely to stay with consumers throughout their lives: newspapers. Roughly 43 percent of consumers read the same newspapers as their parents. This isn’t all that surprising since there aren’t that many different newspapers distributed widely (independent of local rags). Toothpastes, banks, and coffee came in second where around 30 percent of respondents used the same brands as their parents. And nearly 20 percent of respondents drove the same cars as their parents (most consistently among men).

In spirt of the strong loyalty people have to products from their youth, all marketers search for opportunities to get people to switch brands. However, there are only two times in the life of a consumer when switching brands tends to occur: when people hit their early 30s (i.e., move in with their partners) and when parents become empty nesters (i.e., when their children move out).

In the former scenario – moving in with partners – the study found that the partner who does the shopping maintains their loyalty to their brands while the partner who does not is often forced to convert to “other brand.”

In the latter scenario – empty nesters seeking new brands - suggests that influence runs in both directions: parents influence kids purchasing decisions but so too do kids influence parents’ decisions. And so, you can imagine the energy that marketers expend to win over new customers at these important “life stages”. However, trying to break this cycle – to change what a person wants – is not the only opportunity to create new brand loyalties.

Marketers have a third option for wooing non-customers: don’t break-up the marriage between brands and people. Let loyalties remain in tact.

One marketer that has figured this out is the relative newcomer to the Australian retail banking industry: ING Direct. Rather than require that their banking customers switch banks, ING has devised initiatives to allow their customers to maintain their existing relationships – to “date other people” as it were when it comes to banking. According to ING Direct’s head of Marketing & Communications Amanda Houlihan, “Our research showed us that Australians are less inclined to change banks, which is why we don’t require them to.” As a result, “our customer base is growing at a rate of between 15,000 and 20,000 per month and in terms of demographics, they are from all age groups, all income brackets and all parts of the country.”

All too often, companies make the mistake of overzealous expectations. While it sounds good to own 100% of a market, the fact is, most consumers don’t want to give any company 100% of anything in their lives (unless they must). 

When designing your marketing strategy, consider how your new products, brand, and innovation pipeline exists within the larger context of your customers’ lives. Allow them to play with others. And use those relationships to prove your worth. 

Having competitors is the best thing for innovation. Encourage and invest in the category versus trying to protect it.

_____________________________________________

- Andrew Razeghi (follow me on twitter @andrewrazeghi)

May 30, 2011

Because of You: A Commencement Speech for Entrepreneurs

Filed under: Innovation, Inspirational — admin @ 4:24 pm

They got in. You dropped out.

They went to school. You went to work.

They learned. You earned.

And here we are today.

Today has been marked on calendars for decades. It is a day for which many parents have planned, saved, and hoped for since their children were born.

Today, idealists, disguised in black gowns and flat hats, will update their virtual avatars while a parade of perfect strangers - the famous, almost famous, and used-to-be-famous lend inspiration and wisdom upon those gathered.

There will be speeches. And speeches. And speeches.

There will be pomp. There will be circumstance. But most of all there will be mixed emotions.

Smiles will rise. Tears will fall.

The best years of life may have ended, but alas, a new beginning awaits; something greater, a commencement.

And so goes the uplifted words of the commencement speech.

To mark this occasion, new graduates will waltz to somber brass as their all-too-complicated-to-pronounce full names are read aloud to those who share those all-too-complicated-to-pronounce names.

These new graduates will pause to greet (many for the first and only times) those they have rebelled against for the greater part of four years. And when they do, they will shake their hands.

This is graduation day.

For you, however, today is just another Saturday; just another day in an otherwise misunderstood, but chosen and blessed life.

For you, school was something you entertained because, well, that’s what you were supposed to do. Get on the bus. Sit in class. Listen. Raise your hand. Answer the question. Take the test. Pass. Repeat as necessary for the greater part of 20 years and you too would have been here today, commencing.

For you, however, none of this made sense. Ever.

You talked when others listened. And they called you disruptive.

You asked when others answered and they assumed you were slow.

You got distracted when others focused and they sent you to the school nurse.

Your legs shook. Your mind raced. You didn’t fit in.

You are the entrepreneurs.

For you, there will be no commencement speech, no graduation party, and no tearful goodbyes.

For you there will be work.

There will be calls to make, orders to take, and products to ship.

There will be work.

There will be customers to meet, bills to pay, and floors to clean.

There will be work.

There will be investors to manage, employees to engage, and a family to feed.

There will be work.

There will be work.

There will be work.

But because of you, college graduates will have jobs.

Because of you, problems will be solved.

Because of you, we will have measures by which to mark our creativity.

Because of you, we will have cases to be written, books to be published, and buildings to be dedicated.

Because of you, we will have stories to tell college graduates on this day.

Because of you, today is a good day.

Because of you, tomorrow will be better.

And for that, thank you.

-Andrew Razeghi

May 29, 2011

Sweet Land of Irony

Filed under: Leadership, Inspirational — admin @ 6:42 pm

Rebels, misfits and mavericks. My country ’tis of thee. Nonconformists, dissenters and radicals. Sweet land of liberty. Free spirits, freethinkers and freeloaders. Of thee I sing. Who can’t but love a country whose demographic mix has changed vividly since its founding, yet whose behavior remains — more or less — the same? Case in point: Thomas Paine, America’s first spammer (circa 1776). He littered the new world with pamphlets advocating independence from Britain thereby denouncing his government. Fast forward a few hundred years — Paine’s a sanctified revolutionary hero. Ya’ gotta’ love it! 

It should therefore come as no surprise that this great nation is also home to Marion Barry — elected the mayor of our nation’s capital; caught on tape and convicted of drug use; and four years later, he dusted himself off, ran again and won. What a country! Of course, this is not a new phenomenon. We are a country of rule-breakers. It’s our thing. No doubt — a few short years from now — President Richard Nixon will be remembered more for “opening China” than closing blinds. Is it any wonder that only 20 percent of Americans own passports? Who would want to leave this place? 

Then there is this: There are an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States and, according to the United Nations, the United States is second only to the United Kingdom in total number of asylum applications (with more than 60,000 applicants in 2003). Who can blame them? Where else can you express yourself so creatively? And once they get here, consider where they go: Vegas, baby! Sin City is the seventh fastest-growing city on the planet. At 5 percent average annual growth, move over Shanghai, aces are wild! If the United States were a modern-day corporation, we would praise its recruiting and retention strategy — particularly in a world where the average 18-34-year-old American spends only 2.9 years in a job before moving on to the next. Not only do we attract people, we can’t get them to leave. We are the loyalty experts. Although the nightly news may suggest that people hate us, the facts suggest something entirely different. It seems that people love us. While the dire conditions immigrants leave behind are often noted, consider — for a moment — what they are coming to — in droves. We must be doing something right. 

We must have a secret, but what is it? According to the National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 34 percent of American adults are overweight, thus accounting for more than 300,000 premature deaths each year. Throw in our hefty 15-year-old males (10 percent whom are obese) and we rank as the fifth chubbiest country on the planet, yet they still come. According to the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, the United States ranked 15th out of 16 nations on math tests. In physics, we confidently placed dead last, yet still they come. We are backstroking in a sea of debt (to the tune of $8 trillion, according to the Bureau of Public Debt), yet still they come. 

Roughly 42 percent of American households own a gun, resulting in 30,000 gun deaths each year. We are armed and dangerous, yet they still come. We have 1 lawyer for every 190 residents. We sue everybody for everything, yet they still come. We have the second-highest divorce rate on Earth (second only to Aruba), yet still they come. 

And, to make matters worse, we simply refuse to adopt the metric system. Yet, they still come. 

People around the world burn our flag, steal our music and desecrate our embassies, yet they still come. But why? What is our secret? What do we have that they want? It’s simple, really. The United States of America is the land of line dances and second chances. We are the land of hope — the land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrims’ pride. Our streets may not be paved with gold, but our hearts are. We are good. Each American — no matter color or creed — shares one thing in common: We are believers. We are the hopeful, the courageous and the creative. We believe that if our intentions are good and we work hard, we can make a difference. And so, we do. 

We have hope. Although we may not be the smartest, the fittest or the most globally conscious people on the planet, think about what our fast-food-cravin’-dope-smokin’-videogame-playin’ 15-year olds have grown up to achieve over the past 100 years (now that we’ve locked-up the 2 million most rambunctious Americans who crossed the line — giving us the highest prison population on Earth. Incidentally, China, with four times the number of people, is a distant second. At least China can’t take that away from us). In this sweet land of irony, think about what hope has done for America. Between 1901 and 2002, residents of the United States have been awarded more Nobel Prizes than anyone on the planet — 28 in economics; 49 in physiology or medicine; 40 in chemistry; 46 in physics; and 17 for peace. We follow only France in the Nobel Prize for Literature with 12. We are intellectually curious and endlessly creative. This is why they come. 

Since 1896, the United States has won more gold medals at the Olympic Games than any nation (with twice the number of gold medals as the “always a bridesmaid” second-place winner — the former-Soviet Union). We are competitive, willful, disciplined and confident. This is why they come. We give. And it’s not only the world’s two richest men who are global philanthropists (by the way, they too are Americans). More than 70 percent of American households give money to charitable organizations and some 60 percent volunteer their time. We care. This is why they come. Despite our shortcomings, they still come. They come to America because we believe in the capacity of the human spirit to achieve when no one else believes. We have hope. Hope is as central to the American ethic as apple pie and summertime. Hope is our comparative advantage. Hope is your advantage. 

Therefore, in celebration of this Memorial Day, take a chance. Do something crazy; something out of character. (Keep it legal, of course.) Start a business. Take a class. Go to Vegas. Teach. Whatever you do, use the unique gift granted to each and every American. Use hope. Promote it. Act silly. Dance without music. Change something for the better. Putting hope to work is perhaps the most American thing you can do. And then, from every mountainside, let freedom ring! 

What Voices from the Ice Taught Me About Innovation

Filed under: Innovation, Inspirational — admin @ 10:09 am

“On the first day of life there is nothing to remember and everything to hope.” - Aristotle

Permafrost-stunted evergreens raced by my car window.  During the skid, I grew to appreciate why most tourists end their journey at the visitor’s center.  In the wintry wilderness outside of Anchorage, cars are magnetically-attracted to everything but the road.  And so, like long lost friends, my fearless front bumper and a petrified snow bank had no other choice than to meet again.  And when they did, the car shook to an abrupt stop.  “It’s a good thing I didn’t buy that snow globe,” I thought.  “What a mess that would have been.”

The condition of the road was worse than I anticipated - an ice rink navigated only by those with vehicles and egos larger than the last frontier itself.  As for me, my transportation of choice was of the sub-compact sort.  A quick glance over my shoulder confirmed that no one had witnessed my roadside gymnastics.  Fortunately, although my coffee had spilled, my ego had not.  While staring at the reason for my premature exit I thought, “Is this what the park rangers meant by hearing voices from the ice?” followed quickly by “I shouldn’t be here.”  However, given the fortuitous nature of what I was about to encounter, I couldn’t leave.  After all, this unexpected “voice from the ice” was touting the virtues of this book.  Unlike others at the visitor’s center, it seems I was meant to be there - on that road; in that place; and at that time.  Here’s why.

A Chance Encounter
Alaska.  It is arguably the most beautiful place on earth.  Its native people and sourdoughs still wave at passing trains, live off the land, and - at the Wal-Mart in Wasilla - buy more duct tape than anyone on the planet.  Although densely populated with wild life, Alaska is sparsely populated with the human variety.  With over 650,000 square miles, every Alaskan man, woman, and child can stretch out over their very own square mile.  With over three million lakes and three thousand rivers, William Seward was certainly no fool.  Having negotiated this land from the Russians for $0.02/acre, Seward’s Folly would make even Donald Trump blush with envy.  So spectacular is Alaska’s majesty that Henry Garrett wrote in 1905, “If you are old, go by all means.  If you are young, wait.  Why dull one’s capacity for enjoyment by seeing the finest first.”

In March 2005, in celebration of the 25th anniversary of the Alaska Governor’s Conference on Safety, Health, and the Environment, the Governor’s office invited me to deliver a keynote speech on leading innovation.  While I had come to speak, I also learned a few things including how to properly wear a gas mask; why caribou and the oil pipeline love one another; and how not to dress a moose (namely, take it out of your neighbor’s driveway before you gut it).  Although educational, it was the beauty of a chance encounter that left the most memorable impression on me.  Then again, aren’t most of life’s lessons unplanned?

Alaska is thirty minutes from Anchorage – or so I was told.  You need to leave it to see it.  Therefore, as soon as I arrived, I left.  If you have never felt alone – I mean really alone - as if you are the last living being on earth – take a trip into the bush of Alaska during the spring thaw.  In this world of wireless connectivity and therefore perpetual responsibility, I secretly wanted to get lost in the vast emptiness of the last frontier.  However, after witnessing the true meaning of wildlife, I opted for the scenic drive along the Turnagain Arm – an open road with dramatic views of Cook Inlet, beluga whales, dall sheep, and bald eagles.  The obligatory tourist stop along the Arm - and therefore my planned destination – was Portage Glacier, 50 miles south of Anchorage.  Although breathtaking in its beauty, the glacier was all but lost on this urban dweller as the wind, rain, and overcast skies suggested that I seek refuge in the Visitor’s Center.  They pour a great cup of coffee.

Once inside, I was accosted by that bastion of all visitors’ centers – chochkies.  Although, I must admit, the idea of a glacial sand snow globe did pique my interest.  However, I was neither browsing nor buying.  Nor did I have the patience to watch the award-winning film about retreating glaciers entitled “Voices From the Ice”.  Therefore, a map of the area became my de facto excuse for seeking shelter from the storm.  While studying the map, and in some sort of cosmic coincidence, my eyes were immediately drawn to a very small dot – a town – called Hope.  Although it appeared to be about 30 miles further into the wilderness and despite the inclement weather, as one writing a book on hope, I had to drive the road to it.  Like Seinfeld’s Kramer testing his wits by driving as far as possible on an empty tank, I couldn’t resist the urge to keep going.  And so I did.  Diversion became adventure.    

Nestled warmly inside the world’s smallest rental car, I eagerly navigated the increasingly less drivable road through the Kenai Mountains.  And then, it happened.  On the road to Hope, I encountered a sign that begat a skid that begat a stop in the middle of the wilderness.  It was a sign - not a figurative sign, a road sign - a voice from the ice.  It read:  “Avalanche area.  Next 1.5 miles.  Do not stop.”  Given that I have lived the majority of my adult life in urban environments, the last thought that enters my mind when I see the word avalanche is - do not stop.  And so I stopped; got out of my car; and took a photo.  “Stupid tourist,” I later thought, “but what a great photo!” 

With my digital image in tow, I proudly re-inserted myself into my four-wheeled rental shelter like a hunter packing out a fallen deer.  I then laughed out loud as I envisioned the inevitable expression on my wife’s face.  I would surely share this act of bravery with her – certain to be embellished.  Fortunately, the snow held; I was spared; and forty-five minutes later, I arrived in Hope – Alaska’s first Gold Rush town.

An Accidental Lesson
What was once home to over 3,000 people is now inhabited by a couple hundred hangers-on and one unassuming diner with the best barbeque chicken sandwich on the planet.  Over lunch and while reflecting on the gravity of the situation I had just put myself in, it hit me - an epiphany that is - a metaphor that only nature and man’s attempt to co-exist with it could yield.  Here, in the heart of God’s country, stands a poetically-coincidental lesson in leadership.  Along a weather-beaten road to a forgotten yet once-celebrated town called Hope is an encouraging message for all those who make the journey.  Drive beyond fear.  Do not stop.  Hope is just around the corner.

If you are starting a business, launching a new product, or simply entertaining the idea of going it alone, I suppose it goes without saying that you need to believe in yourself, the idea, and those around you “beyond a reasonable doubt”. Doubt is the fastest road to ruin. At the start of any new venture, odds are your wrong about something if not everything you are doing - the idea, the size of the market, the enthusiasm with which customers will stand in line to buy your big idea. HOPE is not about wishful thinking. It’s about believing. If you don’t believe, no one else will either: not potential investors, customers, or employees. The greatest leaders are believers. Spend some time figuring out what you really believe before you work in pursuit of it.

May 26, 2011

The Genius Between Us: What Makes Collaborative Innovation Work

Filed under: Innovation — admin @ 8:53 am

What if they had never met: the Beatles’ John Lennon and Paul McCartney; Apple’s Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs; or Berkshire Hathaway’s Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger? Would any of them have achieved the same level of success in the absence of the other or in partnership with someone else?

Beyond these creative duos, what about the fate of creative groups: the French impressionist painters of the nineteenth century, Lockhead’s infamous Skunk Works, or the decades-long musical collaboration between producers Brian Eno, Daniel Lanois, and the stadium successful rock quartet U2? Are there unique factors in their relationships that are also responsible for their unusual achievements? If so, what are they? And can they be replicated?

Popular lore suggests that successful collaboration must have something to do with being different from one another (opposites attract) or that success is a result of having shared motives. As it turns out, neither of these factors are critical to success. In fact, quite the contrary appears to be true. Often diverse backgrounds and shared motives are among the very factors that ultimately destroy creative relationships or, at the very least, lead to their premature demise. Warren Buffett’s “cerebral sidekick” Charlie Munger put it this way: “You know that cliché that opposites attract? Well, opposites don’t attract. Everybody engaged in complicated work needs colleagues.”[i] That is not to say that successful collaborators don’t disagree. Google co-founders’ Larry Paige and Sergey Brin are said to have disagreed on almost everything when they first met.[ii] Charlie Munger’s no holds barred reputation for scrutinizing deals earned him the nickname The Abominable No-Man. Says Buffett, “If we ask Charlie something and he says ‘no’ then we put all of our money in it. If he says, ‘that’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard,’ then we make a more modest investment.”[iii] What often holds great creative partnerships together is – among other things – shared interest and values. This shared enthusiasm for the topic at hand whether that’s making money or producing music is both the basis for the formation of the relationship and is often what keeps it together.

Unlike Google’s Paige and Brin, oftentimes the differences between collaborators are discovered long after they’ve begun collaborating, not before. And once those differences are discovered, they typically become significant sources of conflict. The most successful collaborators are masters at conflict resolution. And, incidentally, their methods have nothing to do with legal agreements.

As for the role of shared motives, the opposite is more often true. Different motives – what each partner hopes to gain from the relationship - provides the space for individuals to contribute to the relationship while not interfering with each other’s individual goals. Steve Wozniak, inventor of the personal computer, reflects, “Once I realized that I could own a company and not have to run it, I was convinced to leave Hewlett-Packard and start Apple with Steve Jobs. My goal was to remain an engineer; to continue to work with my hands. I didn’t want to run a company nor did the notoriety matter that much to me. Steve Jobs’ goals were different. Even as kids, he always aspired to be the guy that could see things before anyone else. That’s what he wanted: to be Einstein or Shakespeare. I got what I wanted and so did he.”[iv]

While having a shared vision or a common goal helps to steer the relationship in the same direction, understanding and communicating individual motives is just as critical to ensuring success over time. When motives are known, the relationship can function much more effectively. And often, when these motives differ, the relationship has an even better chance of success.
As it turns out, when it comes to sustainable partnerships, it appears that success is often attributed to the wrong factors. Successful collaboration is not as simple as bringing together a diverse group of people with the same goals. Nor is it the result of drafting and adhering to iron clad legal agreements. Sometimes, the opposite is true. The same is true of organizations seeking to collaborate as it is for individual relationships.

Cheryl Perkins, former Chief Innovation Officer for Kimberly-Clark and founder of InnovationEdge claims that successful collaboration depends upon the choices made very early in the relationship. “The trouble comes at the beginning,” she observes. “The values of the companies are not aligned or the leadership of both companies is not aligned. The next thing you know, you’re two or three years down the road and end up in a lot of battles. Not to mention, you’re not getting anything to market.”

As Perkins and others who have managed innovation inside of large companies suggests: it doesn’t matter how big the idea is, if the relationship fails, so too does the idea. It’s still a great idea, but no one will ever know it because it’s buried in a failed relationship. How do you fix it? According to Perkins, “You need clear boundaries and principles for how you are going to work before you ever bring lawyers into the picture. And so, we always talk about making sure that the values are aligned; making sure leadership on both sides share these values; and that you have a framework for working together. If these three things are done up front, I haven’t seen any problems with collaboration. If they aren’t, then within six, twelve, eighteen months, we see quite a bit of problems. The conflict comes in different forms: either side isn’t devoting the right skills, resources, or funding; it isn’t clear who owns what; how intellectual property is valued and managed; how profits are shared, how you face the customer; and so on. Roles and responsibilities get muddy. There can be a lot of downside to collaboration if you don’t figure out “the how” early on - how to work together. The “what” is the easy part: we are going to do such and such by this time. The how is the problem. Once that’s figured out, working on the what - the product we’ll introduce together, the new market we will open up – is much easier. The problem is that people don’t want to spend the time. They rush into the relationship because they see this great opportunity to do something together, but they often overlook what makes collaboration work. They say: oh, we need this partnership. Let’s get the agreement signed. Let’s move. Let’s do this. The upside is huge! And then it fails because it turns out they were not ready to work together.”[v]

Successful collaborators invest in their relationship as much as their goals. Whether those goals come in the form of artistic or scientific achievement or athletic or business performance, their intent remains the same: succeed together. Focusing on distractions such as the opportunity instead of the relationship or debating legalese instead of values partly explains why most creative partnerships fail to sustain themselves beyond some initial success. This applies to individuals and organizations. However, there is one difference between the two: organizations tend to be a bit more organized than individual collaborators insofar that they invest heavily in processes to ensure success. Individuals are more willing to “wing it”. Fortune 500 companies are not.

Process however doesn’t ensure success. The problem comes when they get the process wrong. By employing ill-conceived methods in the pursuit of innovation, even the most methodical collaborators can fail. For example, a widely-used technique for innovation inside of large enterprises is to gather a group of diverse people with shared goals together in a room, give them a problem, and ask them to innovate. And if that doesn’t work, assign someone with the responsibility to find an outside partner that can help close the gap between where the organization is and where it wants to go. This typically involves finding another organization that has some proprietary intellectual property or brand equity or expertise in manufacturing or distribution and “do a deal” with them. It works sporadically – often as a “one off” - but the approach is unsustainable. The organizations will cooperate. In other words, they’ll get along because they have been asked to, but they won’t likely achieve sustainable success. They won’t succeed beyond the project, the current problem, or the one big idea. Nor will they do as Steve Jobs demands of his colleagues at Apple: “make a dent in the universe”. If only collaboration was that simple. Yet, at the same time, it’s not that difficult to make collaboration work if you abide by the rules that govern successful collaborations. As it turns out, there is a tie that binds those that succeed that virtually guarantees their success.

I call it Collaborative Intelligence.

Collaborative Intelligence is a framework that consists of a set of principles, skills and behaviors commonly-found among successful collaborators. Those relationships whose participants have higher levels of Collaborative Intelligence not only succeed, but they succeed over extended periods of time whereas those with lower levels of Collaborative Intelligence fail to sustain their success. They become one hit wonders. Those individuals that maintain a high degree of Collaborative Intelligence will not only be sought after for their unique skills, they will win faster and with greater impact than their peers. And organizations that are able to recruit and retain individuals with high levels of Collaborative Intelligence will also share in their success. If you are involved in collaboration or you are considering entering one – starting a new business, launching a new product, managing a team - deciding to collaborate with others is just the start. How you collaborate with them will determine whether or not you will succeed. 



     

[i] Lowe, J. (2000). Damn Right! Behind the Scenes with Berkshire Hathaway Billionaire Charlie Munger. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p. 7.

[ii] Larry Page and Sergey Brin met at Stanford University in 1995. Larry, 24, a University of Michigan grad, was considering the school; Sergey, 23, was assigned to show him around. According to some accounts, they disagreed on just about everything during their first meeting. http://www.google.com/corporate/history.html
 
[iii] Warren Buffett’s The Abominable No-Man quote is from The World’s Billionaires, March 5, 2008. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/lists/2008/10/billionaires08_Charles-Munger_RTN3.html
 
[iv]Wozniak, S. (2008, December 19). Author interview with Steve Wozniak: the prankster who invented the personal computer. (A. Razeghi, interviewer).
 
[v] Perkins, C. (2008, December 22). Author interview with Cheryl Perkins, former Chief Innovation Officer at Kimberley-Clark and founder of InnovationEdge  (A. Razeghi, Interviewer).
 
Next Page »

Powered by WordPress